As I normally do when replying to board messages, I checked off the "sent copy
to message sender via e-mail box" when responding to this thread. For those of
you who missed my post, here it is:
> apparently simply for bringing
> >:up the topic of hoarding, even in jest.
> Oh PLEASE.... I have been reading this thread since the beginning (I was one
> the first people to respond to the original poster) and since I know NONE of
> the principals here, I have stayed out if it... until now.
> Dottie, you have made it CLEAR that you dislike Nancy, and have so for some
> time. I remember when I read your post about hoarders and went to the
> I found it a particulary pernicious thing to say. To PRETEND this was said
> jest" without animosity or rancor is simply, and very CLEARLY, an untruth.
> I do not know Nancy, Lisa, John or any of the others on the board. But, it
> seems to me, if I had to choose who was at least being HONEST about their
> motives, I would choose any of them over you.
> (And... by the way... John's behavior may be "atypical"... but, it is not
> "untypical", as "untypical" is not a word.)
sheila, do me a favor? mind your own business. and
please respond to the group, not to me personally. you
do know how newsgroups work, don't you?
oh, yeah. if you want to be a hall monitor, i suggest
that you start off in grade school somewhere and then
work your way up.
i repeat: do not send me another e-mail.
1. What is written here is open to the public. I am part of the public.
Therefore, it is my business.
2. I always send a copy via e-mail to the poster as a matter of courtesy.
Never let it be said that people do not know when I have said something about
3. When you list your supposed "motives", especially when they are so clearly
disingenuous, you open the door to questions/comments about your motives,
attitudes and intentions. This isn't "playing hall monitor", this is
responding to what you have put forth. If you don't want to have your
behaviors commented upon, perhaps you should not put them out there to be