Am I the only one sick of.....?

Description of your first forum.

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Hervoye » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00



  Just one question. Doesn't the name of this group end with "breeds" and not
"breed"?  It doesn't have the words "Pit" or "Bull" in it right? Just a little
sick of digging through the Pit arguments in their various forms to get to the
posts. I think based solely on the number of people interested in the
conversations that the Pits should have their own group and if one already
exists should go there forthwith or to the nearest parallell dimension. Plain
dumb venting but there is a lot of that in here. "Pit's on chains", "Pit's who
kill!", "Abused Pits and what you can do about it", and of course "Abused
ring-fighting
Pit-Bulldog-Elephant-Crack-Monkey-Terriers to be used in new Taco Bell
spot.....what you can do about it!" Anyone got any Deerhounds? I got one. To
date he hasn't been chained to a rusty oil drum and I really love him. I don't
have a web page describing how many fights he's had. I just go around telling
everyone how much fun he is to wrestle with and play tug of war with. When the
Saluki's don't want to get involved I can usually take Cody on without a
problem. When I get 4-5 Saluki's ganging up on me to help their Scottish buddy
I  get punked. No chance whatsoever.   I like the amusing story type of post
and the informative stuff about dogs health and such. Like to see more posts of
that and less of the 200 reply threads debating the merits of dog fighting.
Like there are any merits and like anyone involved in this can be reasoned
with.

Blah,Blah,Blah
Hervoyel1

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by OldD » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:
>Just one question. Doesn't the name of this group end with "breeds" and not
>"breed"?  It doesn't have the words "Pit" or "Bull" in it right? J

 Yap ,yap ,yap. Sorry bud but as long as ***s like Petey/Carlo/Patton
continue to post BULLShit about the breed and attemtp to keep everything
focused on dogfighting ,a
practice which a MINISCULE amount of owners engage in
then we'll keep refuting their collective bullshit.

   If YOU don't like it then hit your frigging delete key. Sorry
but it's not a newsgroup for ONLY you.

    And as far as your sarcastic BULLSHIT inreference to the breed ,perhaps
YOU* need to educate yourself about them
before you run your mouth and add to the bandwidth waste
you so hypocritically whine about.

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Tibbi Scot » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00



Quote:

>  Just one question. Doesn't the name of this group end with "breeds" and not
>"breed"?  It doesn't have the words "Pit" or "Bull" in it right? Just a little
>sick of digging through the Pit arguments in their various forms to get to the
>posts.

I let my filter kill any post with the word "pit" in it.  You might do the same.
That is, if AOL will ever program a filter into that software they give you.

Better to switch to a real ISP, and a good newsreader with good filtering
abilities, that way you can just ignore the pit trolls.

--
Tibbi Scott (Standard Disclaimer: my views are my own.)

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Hervoye » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:
>I let my filter kill any post with the word "pit" in it.  You might do the
>same.
>That is, if AOL will ever program a filter into that software they give you.

>Better to switch to a real ISP, and a good newsreader with good filtering

  Got one, Use SWBell here in Houston most of the time but I am in the habit of
using aol to read the groups. It's where I began so I just kept using it. Looks
like you may be right about switching to something more suited to the terrain
though.
 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Hervoye » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:
> Yap ,yap ,yap. Sorry bud but as long as ***s like Petey/Carlo/Patton
>continue to post BULLShit about the breed and attemtp to keep everything
>focused on dogfighting ,a
>practice which a MINISCULE amount of owners engage in
>then we'll keep refuting their collective bullshit.

>   If YOU don't like it then hit your frigging delete key. Sorry
>but it's not a newsgroup for ONLY you.

>    And as far as your sarcastic BULLSHIT inreference to the breed ,perhaps
>YOU* need to educate yourself about them
>before you run your mouth and add to the bandwidth waste
>you so hypocritically whine about.
></PRE></HTML>

  My sarcasm was directed not at a breed of dog but a breed of poster/owner.
All of you guys seem to me to be interested in these dogs for the most juvenile
of reasons. I don't need any more education about this breed thank you. Will my
education on Pit's be taught by someone as articulate and wise as you?
  Instead of refuting their collective "Bullshit" why don't you try hitting
your own delete key and posting things about the breed that are positive? I was
never under the impression that this or any other newsgroup was here only for
me. I was simply pointing out the obvious. Posts on Pits are easily the worst
reading, most disinformation filled, poorly written stuff in here and it's
crack-baby-shakespears like yourself writing them.
  Now of course we come to the "wasting bandwidth" garbage that every putz with
a keyboard and an attitude cries about. So what. You bothered to launch this
idiotic post quoted above and in it you can actually complain that I am wasting
bandwidth?
  Loser.

Hervoyel1

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by GSDlove » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:

> >Just one question. Doesn't the name of this group end with "breeds" and not
> >"breed"?  It doesn't have the words "Pit" or "Bull" in it right? J
>  Yap ,yap ,yap. Sorry bud but as long as ***s like Petey/Carlo/Patton
> continue to post BULLShit about the breed and attemtp to keep everything
> focused on dogfighting ,a
> practice which a MINISCULE amount of owners engage in
> then we'll keep refuting their collective bullshit.

Now you are starting to sound as boring and as rude as them.

Quote:

>    If YOU don't like it then hit your frigging delete key. Sorry
> but it's not a newsgroup for ONLY you.

your right maybe we should keep it down to less than 75% APBT?? or if
there is that much interest in it maybe they should start thier own news
group

Quote:

>     And as far as your sarcastic BULLSHIT inreference to the breed ,perhaps
> YOU* need to educate yourself about them
> before you run your mouth and add to the bandwidth waste
> you so hypocritically whine about.

Again with the potty mouth, it is amazing if anyone takes any of you
serious.

Rich

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Stri » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00



says...

Quote:
>  My sarcasm was directed not at a breed of dog but a breed of poster/owner.
>All of you guys seem to me to be interested in these dogs for the most
>juvenile of reasons. I don't need any more education about this breed thank

you.

Who is all of you guys, I am glad that your sarcasm was not directed at the
breed but I don't know what you mean by the most juvenile of reasons?  The
threads you are so against were all begun by anti-Pit Bull individuals, so why
shouldn't people who own and or like the breed be able to defend themselves or
respond to those who insult and slander them or their breed?

Also, I haven't read from anyone who condoned mis-using the breed most of us
"Pit Bull" owners have our dogs as loving companions and want nothing more from
them than exactly that so when an attack on character is made on a group of
people as a whole without regards to individual intentions or facts then we
have the right to answer these attacks.

Quote:
> Will my
>education on Pit's be taught by someone as articulate and wise as you?
>  Instead of refuting their collective "Bullshit" why don't you try hitting
>your own delete key and posting things about the breed that are positive?

Yes it is true that the responses of some are more colorful then others but
that is true on both sides of the coin, so instead of grouping everyone under
one character as all bad people all individuals should be considered on a
personal(individual) basis- this has not happened as of yet, at least not from
my viewpoint.  Also, we have repeatedly posted positive things about the breed,
but it seems as though these things are ignored as apparantly the negative
seems to be more appealing.

Quote:
>I was
>never under the impression that this or any other newsgroup was here only for
>me. I was simply pointing out the obvious. Posts on Pits are easily the worst
>reading, most disinformation filled,

Yes this is true, however that disinformation is coming from the many anti-pit
people out there who insists on posting to cause a reaction from the Pro-Pit
people- so if we are guilty of anything it is being human in that we are
unfortunately giving them the reaction they seek.  Would you do any less if
someone posted slander against Deerhounds?

Quote:
> poorly written stuff in here and it's
>crack-baby-shakespears like yourself writing them.

If there is a problem between two individuals fine, but there is no reason to
lump everyone into an insulting catagory.

I happen to love my APBT very much and would defend her to the extent of my
ability as I believe you would probably do the same for your Deerhound, so
while yes you are right that the posts often get out of hand it is not the
Pro-Pit people who are the only ones causing the problem here.

Kim and Majyck the APBT of Love

Quote:
>Hervoyel1

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Cavanau » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00



I know what you mean, I am one of those "pit bull people" and became
interested in this NG at first because there were some reasonable
Bully owners on here.  Now I just check up every now and then to see
if things have quieted down and people are posting civil material
again.  Oh well, I guess that's why e-mail lists are nice.

Kari

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by OldD » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:
>Again with the potty mouth, it is amazing if anyone takes any of you
>serious.

   OOhhh he said "potty".   Sorry there Bud but use of the word BULLSHIT
doesn't wuite qualify. And if Clowns like YOU
expect folks to set around and let Petey/Carols etc. post BULLSHIT just because
you don't want to here then that's just
tttoooooobbbad.

   It's really a teethgrinder for types like you when people don't jump when
they say frog isn't it.

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by OldD » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:
>My sarcasm was directed not at a breed of dog but a breed of poster/owner.

  More yapping. It was directed at something you were too damned lazy to
delete. Period.

Quote:
>poster/owner.
>All of you guys seem to me to be interested in these dogs for the most
>juvenile
>of reasons.

   You have ZERO idea why anyone is interested in this breed and
are too freaking close minded to try and find out.

Quote:
>I don't need any more education about this breed thank you.

   You DON'T HAVE any "education on these breeds.

Quote:
>Will my
>education on Pit's be taught by someone as articulate and wise as you?

   You fail to understand that I realyy don't give a fig what a bigot
like you thinks.

Quote:
>Instead of refuting their collective "Bullshit" why don't you try hitting
>your own delete key and posting things about the breed that are positive?

    Sorry Bud but I and others aren't about to let this BULLSHIT go unanswered.
As far as promoting the breed in a positive light . I DO. EVERYDAY.

Quote:
>I was
>never under the impression that this or any other newsgroup was here only for
>me.

    You're last little sniveling diatribe looked that way.

Quote:
>I was simply pointing out the obvious.

    No you were sniveling.

Quote:
>Posts on Pits are easily the worst
>reading, most disinformation filled, poorly written stuff in here and it's
>crack-baby-shakespears like yourself writing them.

   Bullshit of the highest water. which you might find out had you ever read
any of 'em.

Quote:
>yourself writing them.
>  Now of course we come to the "wasting bandwidth" garbage that every putz
>with
>a keyboard and an attitude cries about. S

   Yup thats what you were sniveling in your Wheaties about alright.

Quote:
>You bothered to launch this
>idiotic post quoted above and in it you can actually complain that I am
>wasting
>bandwidth?

     ANd YOU bothered to waste even more bandwidth with your ***
above that serves no useless purpose.

Quote:
> Loser.

     Recto-Cranially impacted Clown.
 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by GSDlove » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:

> >Again with the potty mouth, it is amazing if anyone takes any of you
> >serious.

>    OOhhh he said "potty".   Sorry there Bud but use of the word BULLSHIT
> doesn't wuite qualify. And if Clowns like YOU
> expect folks to set around and let Petey/Carols etc. post BULLSHIT just because
> you don't want to here then that's just
> tttoooooobbbad.

>    It's really a teethgrinder for types like you when people don't jump when
> they say frog isn't it.

so what's your point sewer mouth?
 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by GSDlove » Fri, 10 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Quote:

>    Yup thats what you were sniveling in your Wheaties about alright.
>    Recto-Cranially impacted Clown.

Maybe you should be chained to a stake and have a oil can for a den.
Most mad dogs are put down. To bad your owner did not take you in for
shots...maybe your desease could have been prevented. What kind of a
dumb piece of donkey shit are you Olddgs or should your name be "Shit
for brains" Shut up before everyone decides to give all ABPT a dirt
nap!!!!  Stupid ***s like you are not helping us ABPT owners that
are polite.... You***head...swearing is all you seem to understand
every post with your name on it looks like a freeway underpass in need
of a paint job. I have seen bathroom stalls with better writting than
your post...MORON!!!! help us by not helpung us PLEASE!!!

          OLDdGS  KENNEL-UP!!!!!!!

my apologies to those of you that are civil for having to read this ***

Big Doggie

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Petyr Lufftha » Sat, 11 Apr 1998 04:00:00



Quote:
>>Again with the potty mouth, it is amazing if anyone takes any of you
>>serious.

>   OOhhh he said "potty".   Sorry there Bud but use of the word BULLSHIT

(snip more ***, foul-mouthed ranting)

Brace yourself for the barrage of insults and obscenities that are
about to be hurled at you by the this "olddgs" kid.  

Any attempt to comment or inquire about the true nature of, behavior
of, or customary ways of keeping (read: 24/7 chaining)  pit bulls will
immediately and automatically elicit a foul stream of nastiness from
him.  Note also that your questions will be dodged, sidestepped and
eventually pushed aside in the subsequent torrent of flaming,
infighting and insults.

I'm going to bet that within 24 hours, he will be unable to control
himself and  will resort to pathetically juvenile and lewd insults
about your ***ia.  And they wonder why the breed has such a bad
rap...they learn their ill-mannered ways from their owners!

Why don't pit people wake up and realize their own obnoxious behavior
( and the belligerant nature of their dogs) is the number one reason
why the breed is being banned?  Why don't they stop blaming "media
hysteria" and start working on the real problem-that of irresponsible
breeding and ignorant, *** owners who use the dogs as weapons or
boosts to their egos?

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Treesk » Sat, 11 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Big Doggie
With all UNdue respect - Kiss my ass.  The individual you are referring to has
forgotten more while taking a shit than you will ever know about bulldogs.  Go
home and sit down you are obviously not much of a man.

 
 
 

Am I the only one sick of.....?

Post by Treesk » Sat, 11 Apr 1998 04:00:00


Hey ***, where does this info regarding 24/7 chaining come from?  I own
several APBT and they might get chained 4 hrs/day while I am not at home.
Maybe we APBT people are just that much more responsible to properly restrain
our dogs than others.  What about the Rot, GSD, Lab, Dane, Dalmation, etc,etc
bites that go for the most part TOTALLY unreported every day?