dog + backpacking => liver disease

Description of your first forum.

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Sky Warri » Fri, 10 Sep 1993 03:08:03



I can't say that you *couldn't* get giardia from just cutting the fishing line
with your teeth, but I would think its pretty unlikely.  I would be more suspect
of your filtering system.  Giardia's symptoms include serious diarrhea, gas,
stomach upset, and vommitting.  (Having gone through giardia 3 times with my dogs
I can testify to this).

Giardia is fairly easy to detect.  It requires a simple fecal smear rather than
a full fecal test.  My dogs were diagnosed by having the vet take the smear
off of the thermometer.  

Giardia is *not* a liver disease.  It is a one celled organism that wreaks havoc
in the intestines.  Loss of weight, dehydration, and loss of appetite are
symptoms of giardia.  Because it is a tough organism, more than one treatment
of metronidazole (flagyl) may be required.  If you get giardia, you *will* know
it.  (People who I know have had it lost 5-10 lbs in 1-2 days!)

Asfor teaching Argo not to eat everything he touches, sure it can be done.  My
housepets *know* they aren't supposed to sample from the surrounding cuisine.
My recommendation is to stage set ups -- these are discussed in the book
People, Pooches, and Problems by Job Michael Evans.

Backpacking + dogs does not necessarily = disaster.  Training on your part,
combined with proper restraint will make it a pleasurable (and less costly)
vacation.  

PS:  Always filter or boil water for your dogs when you go into the backcountry.
Boiling water 10 minutes at sea level (15-20 minutes at high altitude) is always
a good precaution.

--
-----------------------------                                              
SKY WARRIOR aka MLH Bonham  | "Good tea.  Nice House." -- Lt. Worf



-----------------------------

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Jeff Schneit » Fri, 10 Sep 1993 01:36:35


Took my 6 month old Golden mix backpacking with me over Labor Day
weekend to Eldorado National Forest, CA. He came back sick with the
diagnosis of "minor liver disease". Without a biopsy the vet could not
be more specific.

His symptoms were:
The second day he vomitted a few times and had fecal matter that
looked like a 2 oz. shot of green mucous. He was very lethargic and
would sleep all day in the sun, and all night on top of a big granite
rock (I thought it was fairly cold out for that). On the trip home he
was having some *** flatulence.

This was Argo's first camping trip, and my guess is that his puppy
instinct of eating everything first, then finding out what it will do
to him later gave him this condition. His was so e***d to be there
that he had to check out everything. At least the vet could not give
me any specific causes for it - he was mostly happy that there was no
blockage. (r.b: nope, he did not eat any goldfish or cats while there
:).

Here is the run-down of the bill:

exam                               26.00
*** screen                       64.00
fecal                              14.50
radiographs                        69.00
injection-im/sq                    32.00
medications sid                     4.00
hosp-prof care/day                 14.00
disp: trimethoprim/sulfa 480        9.00
disp: metronidazole 250mg           9.50 <-- just in case
canine I/D cans                     9.60
----------------------------------------
total                             251.60

Have other people had this type of problem when taking the dog out?
Will I be able to stop him from eating anything that he finds? It
would be VERY hard for me to not bring him with me - I want to go
almost every weekend :(

r.backcountry: one of our party is going in for a checkup for Giardia,
he has quite a few of the symptoms. If he tests positive then I will
also - or should I anyway? The only symptom I had was on the second
day I had the foulest smelling flatulence ever - but I put it down to
the packaged chilli and beans that I had the night before - not all of
the beans were cooked by the prescribed method. We filtered our water,
but used our teeth to cut the fishing line <-- red lights flasing here.

Consideration for the dog's health, to me, would be the best argument
I have heard for not taking your pet into the wild.

jeff
---------------------------------------------------------------

IBM......Almaden Research Center.....San Jose......CA.....95120
Father of Argo the great Golden Unknown........................
Disclaimer: My opinions are mine, not IBM's, nor Microsoft's...

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Jeff Schneit » Fri, 10 Sep 1993 01:43:06


[sorry, meant to originally crosspost, but can't cancel my original
post, so this is redundant for r.p.dogs]

Took my 6 month old Golden mix backpacking with me over Labor Day
weekend to Eldorado National Forest, CA. He came back sick with the
diagnosis of "minor liver disease". Without a biopsy the vet could not
be more specific.

His symptoms were:
The second day he vomitted a few times and had fecal matter that
looked like a 2 oz. shot of green mucous. He was very lethargic and
would sleep all day in the sun, and all night on top of a big granite
rock (I thought it was fairly cold out for that). On the trip home he
was having some *** flatulence.

This was Argo's first camping trip, and my guess is that his puppy
instinct of eating everything first, then finding out what it will do
to him later gave him this condition. His was so e***d to be there
that he had to check out everything. At least the vet could not give
me any specific causes for it - he was mostly happy that there was no
blockage. (r.b: nope, he did not eat any goldfish or cats while there
:).

Here is the run-down of the bill:

exam                               26.00
*** screen                       64.00
fecal                              14.50
radiographs                        69.00
injection-im/sq                    32.00
medications sid                     4.00
hosp-prof care/day                 14.00
disp: trimethoprim/sulfa 480        9.00
disp: metronidazole 250mg           9.50 <-- just in case
canine I/D cans                     9.60
----------------------------------------
total                             251.60

Have other people had this type of problem when taking the dog out?
Will I be able to stop him from eating anything that he finds? It
would be VERY hard for me to not bring him with me - I want to go
almost every weekend :(

r.backcountry: one of our party is going in for a checkup for Giardia,
he has quite a few of the symptoms. If he tests positive then I will
also - or should I anyway? The only symptom I had was on the second
day I had the foulest smelling flatulence ever - but I put it down to
the packaged chilli and beans that I had the night before - not all of
the beans were cooked by the prescribed method. We filtered our water,
but used our teeth to cut the fishing line <-- red lights flasing here.

Consideration for the dog's health, to me, would be the best argument
I have heard for not taking your pet into the wild.

jeff
---------------------------------------------------------------

IBM......Almaden Research Center.....San Jose......CA.....95120
Father of Argo the great Golden Unknown........................
Disclaimer: My opinions are mine, not IBM's, nor Microsoft's...

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Diane Basse » Fri, 10 Sep 1993 04:51:50


Jeff,

Dogs can get Giardia too, you know.  I took my dogs into the Eldorado
Natl. Forest too, and had none of these problems.  Don't give up on
this great adventure.  

I would also have him checked for Lyme disease, although I don't think
the digestive problems are a typical symptom.

I would suspect Giardia.  The way to keep your dog from getting into
everything is to keep him on leash.  it's not as fun, but has benefits
in that you avoid run-ins with skunks, etc.

Where did you go?  email me!  We went to Woods Lake, and hiked to
Roundtop Lake, and Winnemuca.  All were breathtaking.  

I looooooove camping with my dogs.

Diane

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Elfli » Fri, 10 Sep 1993 10:39:30


I've taen Tika camping and hiking *many* times with no problems.  It
isn't necessarily a problem.  I do carry water for her & discourage
drinking from what I consider questionable sources.  Since I do let
her swim in some places (and she drinks whenever she swims) we take
some chances, but I am willing to deal with that.  And so far we've
been fairly lucky.  One round of diarrhea for Tika and we avoided that
particular creek in the future.

Getting liver disease from backpacking strikes me as odd, although I
am certainly no health expert.

Hope your puppy feels better soon though!  And (assuming you take the
pup with you in the future) better luck next time!

.Terri

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Nadja Ado » Sat, 11 Sep 1993 04:17:20


Quote:

>[sorry, meant to originally crosspost, but can't cancel my original
>post, so this is redundant for r.p.dogs]
>Have other people had this type of problem when taking the dog out?
>Will I be able to stop him from eating anything that he finds? It
>would be VERY hard for me to not bring him with me - I want to go
>almost every weekend :(

No, but that's because my dogs were always trained to heel me on the
trail; those that weren't were leashed hunting hounds. If you train him
properly, he won't eat *anything* in the woods without your permission.

Quote:
>he has quite a few of the symptoms. If he tests positive then I will
>also - or should I anyway? The only symptom I had was on the second
>day I had the foulest smelling flatulence ever - but I put it down to
>the packaged chilli and beans that I had the night before - not all of
>the beans were cooked by the prescribed method. We filtered our water,
>but used our teeth to cut the fishing line <-- red lights flasing here.

You should go anyway. Filters aren't always that effective for Giardia -
I use a small pressure cooker and bring my water up to five pounds pressure.

Quote:
>Consideration for the dog's health, to me, would be the best argument
>I have heard for not taking your pet into the wild.

Consideration for the health of the wilderness is the best argument for not
taking one's pet into the wild. If one wants a manmade environment, there are
plenty of city and county parks. I wish people would leave their pets at home,
and stop whining about the bears and the lions causing problems because I
*like* wilderness - and Golden Retrievers aren't wild animals, and bears and
lions are.
 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Alan Gei » Sat, 11 Sep 1993 08:04:26


Quote:

>Consideration for the health of the wilderness is the best argument for not
>taking one's pet into the wild. If one wants a manmade environment, there are
>plenty of city and county parks. I wish people would leave their pets at home,
>and stop whining about the bears and the lions causing problems because I
>*like* wilderness - and Golden Retrievers aren't wild animals, and bears and
>lions are.

People aren't wild animals either.  Your argument implies that people should
stay home too.  

Although my kids are wild, they aren't aren't wild animals in the context of
this discussion.  Nevertheless, I take them with me because I love them, they
enjoy the outdoors, and I like having them with me.  I've had my dog a lot
longer than my kids, and the same reasons apply to my dog.  Needless to say,
my dog has made a lot more backpacking and camping trips than my kids.

I do believe, however, that there are many dogs that do not belong in
the outdoors.  If the dog in question makes a lot of noise, or otherwise
bothers others trying to enjoy the outdoors, it does not belong there, out
of courtesy to others.

A dog can also be very utilitarian in the outdoors.  Mine carries his own
food and equipment, and sometimes a little of mine.  He also guards the
camp at night.  I usually place my backpack just out of reach of him on
his leash.  Presto -- no critters in my pack or food.

Alan Geist

The opionions expressed herein are probably not those of my employer.
What they are I may never know.

"Kid -- Have you rehabilitated yourself?" - Arlo Guthrie

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Peter Norqui » Sun, 12 Sep 1993 05:10:28



|> >

   [stuff deleted...]

|> Although my kids are wild, they aren't aren't wild animals in the context of
|> this discussion.  Nevertheless, I take them with me because I love them, they
|> enjoy the outdoors, and I like having them with me.  I've had my dog a lot
|> longer than my kids, and the same reasons apply to my dog.  Needless to say,
|> my dog has made a lot more backpacking and camping trips than my kids.
|>

So doggies and people should be given equal treatment. Cut me a break!
This arguement is as transparent as it is flawwed.

|> A dog can also be very utilitarian in the outdoors.  Mine carries his own
|> food and equipment, and sometimes a little of mine.  He also guards the
|> camp at night.  I usually place my backpack just out of reach of him on
|> his leash.  Presto -- no critters in my pack or food.

I suggest you read some books on backpacking or go on some organized trips
to learn how to discourage critters from getting your food. A dog is not
necessary. And guard your camp at night? Guard it from what? If sleeping
out is that scary I suggest you camp in your backyard (amidst all the little
piles of doggie sculpture).

Dogs disrupt wilderness ecosystems. They act as disease vectors into and
out of wildlife populations, their presence disrupts wildlife diurnal/
nocturnal movements (especially ungulates and ursine/feline predators)
to a profoundly greater degree than a human presence, and digging, urination
and defecation by your canine buddies also greatly increases "visitor impacts"
to sensitive areas--a subject discussed at length in this group.

Leave the freakin' dog at home! Geez!

-Peter
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Comp. support is the opiate of the physicist." -Paul Spencer
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Alan Gei » Sun, 12 Sep 1993 09:42:31


Quote:

>|> Although my kids are wild, they aren't aren't wild animals in the context of
>|> this discussion.  Nevertheless, I take them with me because I love them, they
>|> enjoy the outdoors, and I like having them with me.  I've had my dog a lot
>|> longer than my kids, and the same reasons apply to my dog.  Needless to say,
>|> my dog has made a lot more backpacking and camping trips than my kids.
>|>

>So doggies and people should be given equal treatment. Cut me a break!
>This arguement is as transparent as it is flawwed.

My argument was exactly as flawed as the statement I was refuting, namely
that the lack of "wildness" of anything is not a valid argument for not
taking it into the woods.

Quote:
>|> A dog can also be very utilitarian in the outdoors.  Mine carries his own
>|> food and equipment, and sometimes a little of mine.  He also guards the
>|> camp at night.  I usually place my backpack just out of reach of him on
>|> his leash.  Presto -- no critters in my pack or food.

>I suggest you read some books on backpacking or go on some organized trips
>to learn how to discourage critters from getting your food. A dog is not
>necessary. And guard your camp at night? Guard it from what? If sleeping
>out is that scary I suggest you camp in your backyard (amidst all the little
>piles of doggie sculpture).

By guarding my camp, I meant exactly what I followed that sentance with,
namely keeping critters out of my food and equipment.

As for other ways to keep animals out of food and equipment, after having
read several books, and having several hundred miles of walking with a
backpack on over the past 20 some years or so, I've found no way as effective
as using my dog.  I don't always take my dog, and am famaliar with and have
used many of the ways you are alluding to.  I've even had to invent a method
I never read or heard about.  So please keep your superiority complex to
yourself.

Quote:
>Dogs disrupt wilderness ecosystems. They act as disease vectors into and
>out of wildlife populations, their presence disrupts wildlife diurnal/
>nocturnal movements (especially ungulates and ursine/feline predators)
>to a profoundly greater degree than a human presence, and digging, urination
>and defecation by your canine buddies also greatly increases "visitor impacts"
>to sensitive areas--a subject discussed at length in this group.

Ahh, finally some interesting information.  And some that I can admit to
not being in a good position to positively refute.  But I'd like to ask if
you could elaborate a little.  My dog is vaccinated against numerous diseases
that are more frequently carried from wild canines to domestic ones.  I am
not familiar with any diseases that typically go from well vaccinated dogs
to unvaccinated wild ones.  Also, how does my dog disrupt diurnal/nocturnal
movements any more than wild canines and other predators far more prevelent
in the same woods than domestic visitors?  Lastly, I do avoid taking my dog
into sensitive areas.  For that matter, I avoid taking myself there for any
more than a brief visit.  I would only camp in such an area for survival
purposes.

Quote:
>Leave the freakin' dog at home! Geez!

>-Peter
>--

If you really want to end domestic animals disrupting ecosystems of wild
areas, then join me and others trying to end cattle and sheep grazing on
wild forested lands.  I've even run into "slow elk" in established and
marked wilderness areas.  Talk about impact!

Lastly Peter, sorry for the flames, but you've got to admit, you kind of
asked for it.  This isn't talk.politics.  Let's keep the flame throwing to
groups where it's really called for, and have a rational discussion.  I never
intended for my original post to be interpreted as flaming, just refuting
of an opinion.  If I find your logical arguments persuasive enough, I might
even stop taking the dog.  But if you're going to keep flame throwing, you
might as well give up now.  I do look forward to your answers, if they are
properly lacking of flames.

Alan Geist

The opionions expressed herein are probably not those of my employer.
What they are I may never know.

"Kid -- Have you rehabilitated yourself?" - Arlo Guthrie
--

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Stephen D. Gra » Sat, 18 Sep 1993 17:47:14


I take my dog camping all the time.
Spare me your "you shouldn't do that" tripe.
Inconsiderate people do far more damage than my dog.
I always try to carry out other people's trash from the backcountry.
I also burry my dogs waste (solid).
He's also very well trained and enjoys going a lot.
And I enjoy having him there.

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Peter Norqui » Thu, 23 Sep 1993 06:07:21



|>
|> I take my dog camping all the time.

For shame.

|> Spare me your "you shouldn't do that" tripe.

Yes, why confuse you with the facts?

|> Inconsiderate people do far more damage than my dog.

And inconsiderate dog owners (of which there are plenty) do even more damage.

|> I always try to carry out other people's trash from the backcountry.

A gold star for the day...

|> I also burry my dogs waste (solid).

Gooood for yooou.

|> He's also very well trained and enjoys going a lot.
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Uh huh...
Most dogs enjoy "going a lot". Anywhere and everywhere.

|> And I enjoy having him there.

And isn't that the bottom line (I WANNA!)?
--

-Peter
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Comp. support is the opiate of the physicist." -Paul Spencer
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 
 
 

dog + backpacking => liver disease

Post by Kief Hillsbe » Sat, 25 Sep 1993 02:42:17




Quote:

> >I suggest you read some books on backpacking or go on some organized trips
> >to learn how to discourage critters from getting your food. A dog is not
> >necessary.

The backcountry of the Sierra is filled with remnants of "organized trips"
led by horsepackers and (especially) the Sierra Club, which in an earlier
day  built huge stone fireplaces and enclosures in places like the Ritter
Lakes and did an enormous amount of ground clearing for campsites.  The
impact of organized trips and horses on the backcountry is a demonstrable
fact. The impact of dogs is minimal.