HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Description of your first forum.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Scritt » Fri, 01 Jan 1999 04:00:00





    by scritto.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA04608


[209.66.79.224])
    by ns1.haxor.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA20814

Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:47:05 -0800



[209.66.79.224] didn't use HELO protocol

Subject: HAPPY NEW YEAR!
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01  (Win95; I)
Status:  

Heh heh
Happy new year! I see you are still spamming!
Boy, some people never learn :-)
Love and kisses
Scritto

 
 
 

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Scritt » Fri, 01 Jan 1999 04:00:00




    by scritto.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA04608


[209.66.79.224])
    by ns1.haxor.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA20814

Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:47:05 -0800



[209.66.79.224] didn't use HELO protocol

Subject: HAPPY NEW YEAR!
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01  (Win95; I)
Status:  

Heh heh
Happy new year! I see you are still spamming!
Boy, some people never learn :-)
Love and kisses
Scritto

 
 
 

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Hohn » Sun, 03 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Check it out, folks--Scritto is sending mailbombs now.  I
sent her bounced message right back to her, and she sent me
100 copies to my email addr.  So I forwarded every single
one of those babies to her ISP.  Good-bye, Scritto!!!  And
have a shitty day!

Karen Hohne

Quote:



>     by scritto.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA04608


> [209.66.79.224])
>     by ns1.haxor.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA20814

> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:47:05 -0800



> [209.66.79.224] didn't use HELO protocol

> Subject: HAPPY NEW YEAR!
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01  (Win95; I)
> Status:

> Heh heh
> Happy new year! I see you are still spamming!
> Boy, some people never learn :-)
> Love and kisses
> Scritto


 
 
 

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Hohn » Sun, 03 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Sorry, typo--that wasn't 100 messages.  That was 1000.  So,
Scritto, get ready to be dumped by your ISP.

Karen Hohne

 
 
 

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Hohn » Sun, 03 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Quote:


> > Sorry, typo--that wasn't 100 messages.  That was 1000.  So,
> > Scritto, get ready to be dumped by your ISP.

> And you by yours.

Shows how much you know.  Mailbombs are about as bad
netiquette as you can get.  Forwarding abuse to

it.  I was advised to forward every one of her posts to
netcom by my ISP.  So live and learn.

Karen Hohne

 
 
 

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Dan Spence » Sun, 03 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Karen,

That will definitely do the trick.  If you read Netcom's Acceptable Use
Guidelines at http://www.ix.netcom.com/netcom/aug.html , this is what you
will find:

"Network security violations include without limitation: (i) attempts to
compromise the security of any Internet account or site; (ii) altering the
header information of e-mail or Usenet postings or other activity that
conceals your e-mail address or prevents recipients from responding; (iii)
interference with service to any user, host or network (including without
limitation mail-bombing or news-bombing,..."

That along with all the Usenet complaints should shut her down for a while.

Dan

Quote:

>Sorry, typo--that wasn't 100 messages.  That was 1000.  So,
>Scritto, get ready to be dumped by your ISP.

>Karen Hohne

 
 
 

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Hohn » Mon, 04 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Quote:

> Karen,

> That will definitely do the trick.  If you read Netcom's Acceptable Use
> Guidelines at http://www.moonsgarden.com/, this is what you
> will find:

> "Network security violations include without limitation: (i) attempts to
> compromise the security of any Internet account or site; (ii) altering the
> header information of e-mail or Usenet postings or other activity that
> conceals your e-mail address or prevents recipients from responding; (iii)
> interference with service to any user, host or network (including without
> limitation mail-bombing or news-bombing,..."

> That along with all the Usenet complaints should shut her down for a while.

I hope so.  Not only was it 1000 messages, but she actually
wrote in the message that she was sending 1000 messages (to
punish me for calling her a ***). And signed her name.
And THEN stripped the headers!  Duh!!!!

Karen Hohne

 
 
 

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Post by Hohn » Mon, 04 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Quote:

> Karen,

> That will definitely do the trick.  If you read Netcom's Acceptable Use
> Guidelines at http://www.moonsgarden.com/, this is what you
> will find:

> "Network security violations include without limitation: (i) attempts to
> compromise the security of any Internet account or site; (ii) altering the
> header information of e-mail or Usenet postings or other activity that
> conceals your e-mail address or prevents recipients from responding; (iii)
> interference with service to any user, host or network (including without
> limitation mail-bombing or news-bombing,..."

> That along with all the Usenet complaints should shut her down for a while.

I hope so.  Not only was it 1000 messages, but she actually
wrote in the message that she was sending 1000 messages (to
punish me for calling her a ***). And signed her name.
And THEN stripped the headers!  Duh!!!!

Karen Hohne