You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch
> Yes of course Steve, now *** off you duff cunt.
He is seriously obsessed and sick.
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
>> Well worded.
> If I were you, I wouldn't be too enthused about having a mental case like
> Clogwog as my champion.
Maybe he is sensible only in response to people far, far less sensible than
he is? Seriously, what would prompt Carroll to start this thread? Twice.
Yes... he posted it twice to a wide range of groups. Maybe more than that -
I am only including the ones which overlap with CSMA and COLA.
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Do you think that when they asked George Washington for ID that he just
whipped out a quarter? -- Steven Wright
> >> Well worded.
> > If I were you, I wouldn't be too enthused about having a mental case like
> > Clogwog as my champion.
> I merely noted his post was well worded...
(snip Snit's lie that I started this thread)
>> Maybe he is sensible only in response to people far, far less sensible than
>> he is? Seriously, what would prompt Carroll to start this thread? Twice.
>> Yes... he posted it twice to a wide range of groups. Maybe more than that -
>> I am only including the ones which overlap with CSMA and COLA.
> How do you know it's him?
1) The sock responds only to him with few exceptions.
2) Uses the same Usenet client as most of Steve's other socks (how many
people use Outlook Express 6?).
3) Steve and BCOALF will take "turns" posting - one will post several times,
then the other... back and forth.
4) Same Usenet provider as most of Steve's other socks.
5) When he says more than "LOL" he uses similar verbage as Steve
6) He immediately accused me of posting with that name - as he does with
many of his socks.
7) Posts to many of the same forums Steve has traditionally posted to - many
of the ones I have been to in the past. He is now including others though.
8) Uses the same *account* on the same Usenet provider
[$$o6x3$qi0tpg1qq3blo2]. That is sorta a smoking gun, if the rest is not
strong enough. :)
In this case, specifically, Steve had not posted for a day... BCOALF posts
and then Steve suddenly posts in response rather quickly after. That is
"Steve's" only post.
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> >> Maybe he is sensible only in response to people far, far less sensible than
> >> he is? ?Seriously, what would prompt Carroll to start this thread? ?Twice.
> >> Yes... he posted it twice to a wide range of groups. ?Maybe more than that -
> >> I am only including the ones which overlap with CSMA and COLA.
> > How do you know it's him?
> Several ways:
However, not to be undone of course by these 145 supported quotes on
Snit Circus of Pathological Myths, alphabetised and with substantial
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to
and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
Sandman's website, and yes he's that ***ed in the head and starved
attention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So,
don't get sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this
instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave
Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I have
made the same wish of him." 27 Feb 2005
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup." 27 Feb 2005
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to
out of killfiles proves that you're an ***." 25 Jun 2007
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are?
could show your enemies up by being better than them, rise above the
level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes,
troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire,
it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
7- BaJoRi: "You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who has read
your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be wrong,
added even more, just to be a*** and REALLY show you to be a fool.
need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you are an
intellectually dwarfed turd- burglar." 11 Nov 2008
8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do
same.." 5 Aug 2006
9- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
discussion about anything." 27 Dec 2004
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people
just can't stop feeding him."
10- ?b? unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually =:-
9 Oct 2004
11- Brian: "LOL, Has anyone ever been more universally hated on the
than Snit? Too bad he craves the hatred and negative attention. We
read about him in the news some day soon going on a shooting rampage.
Somebody should get the pychopath some help before he VT's a bunch of
people. 29 May 2007
12- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill, but you and Steve don't
help. You encourage him to post, which he doesn't need to do. We would
be better off if you just ignore him. 17 Nov 2004
13- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in
groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like
would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only
14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
15- cc (COLA): "You are incapable of letting anything go. In fact, I
guarantee you will respond to this post in under 3 hours. Hell, I'd be
surprised if it takes longer than 30 minutes. If I really wanted to, I
could make this little side topic go on forever, because you are a
complete moron who just has to respond to anything written about or to
you, even if it just means repeating yourself." 1 Feb 2010
16- Chance Furlong: "HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve Carroll and
Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You, on the other hand, are a
troll." 27 Aug 2009
17- Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "I try to go more by the contents of the
Although some clowns (e.g. Snit) spew out so much chaff it is not
the effort." 14 Feb 2010
18- Chris Clement: "ugh....geez man.....let it go" 5 Jul 2006
19- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for
way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot,
simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes. It's now far too
*flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005
20- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to
argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
up? What results are you expecting?"
21- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your
and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any
further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my
problem". 22 Nov 2007
22- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read]
please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please,
please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
23- Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost
of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many
diverse people who share a common perception where do you think the
problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't
require an advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004
24- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented to
I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30 Nov 2006
25- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i stop
responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the magnitude
your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's sharpness when i
responding to you. you almost always start responding back in a semi
normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i
only ask that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child
having to put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well, if
wife is a loser as well, just pass those condolences to the rug-rat to
if not, double condolences to her). " 30 Apr 2005
26- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest
Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009
27- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've pulled.
all about your sick need for attention, your need to be center stage
all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
look at you." 18 May 2007
28- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, ...
read more »
13. Hiring a trainer