God should have played with mice before creating humanity!

Description of your first forum.

God should have played with mice before creating humanity!

Post by His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammoc » Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:19:18




Quote:


> > The main reason for the cross is not so that God could forgive us.
> > Jesus engineered and executed the plan to be the second Adam and the
> > main purpose was to make us like Adam was before he ate the fruit - to
> > break the curse.

> If Jesus engineered such a plan, why did Jesus think God was forsaking
> him by letting him (Jesus) execute his plan?

Jesus had a big fight with his Dad upon returning to Heaven. The
argument could have happened like this...

Jesus: "Hey dad, you could have stopped my pain and crush the Romans
like roaches!"

God: "Well, we needed to prove the point that you died for humanity's
sin."

Jesus: "Who cares, you are the boss anyway!"

God: "Not exactly, but yes I'm in charge. You are my puppet, so to
speak."

Jesus: "You know what. I give a *** about humanity and all your
grandiose plans."

And Jesus went to another galaxy far away from his father, where he
went to breed mice.

***

Actually I think God should have played with mice before creating
humanity!

'World as Laboratory: Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men' by
Rebecca Lemov

Lemov explores the behavi***sciences during the years 1900-60, after
which much of the human experimentation previously conducted acquired
an odious reputation; the author remarks she was predisposed to
dislike the psychologists, anthropologists, and sociologists who
conducted it. Lemov improved her opinion of them, but her well-
researched book nevertheless imparts a sense of uneasiness about human
engineering. An outgrowth of stimulus-response experiments on animals,
behavior modification of people became the goal of ambitious
psychologists such as John Watson, coiner of the conditioned-response
theory. Tellingly, he eventually went into advertising, while in his
wake in the 1920s, foundations directed by behaviorist enthusiasts
funded behavi***science centers at Yale and Harvard. With World War
II, Lemov remarks, their denizens traded lab coats for uniforms,
applying behavi***theories to occupied areas. A balanced account of
the behaviorists' crusade, Lemov's history provides crucial backstory
to contemporary practices in psychology and mass media.

http://www.moonsgarden.com/

-------------------------------------------------

THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS

"Study the mice not the Bible to understand much of the world"

http://www.moonsgarden.com/

 
 
 

God should have played with mice before creating humanity!

Post by His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammoc » Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:31:27


One of my mice escaped without a reason. He just walked out on me and
is hiding.

If I were God I wouldn't have created humanity.

I just love one mouse out of three. He must be a wise mouse.

 
 
 

God should have played with mice before creating humanity!

Post by His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammoc » Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:12:49


On Jul 21, 2:31?am, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the

Quote:
> One of my mice escaped without a reason. He just walked out on me and
> is hiding.

> If I were God I wouldn't have created humanity.

> I just love one mouse out of three. He must be a wise mouse.

The three mice have come and gone, and I'm waiting until all rascals
get together to shut the cage.

They seem to have a mind of their own (predictably like humans), but
my "Coco" is the good girl. I may decide to expel the other two from
Tibetan Monkey Paradise. They even attack Coco.

You can't trust everybody in the jungle!

 
 
 

God should have played with mice before creating humanity!

Post by His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammoc » Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:46:35



Quote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:54:24 -0700, His Highness the TibetanMonkey,


> >> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:14:02 -0700, His Highness the TibetanMonkey,

> >> > I don't know exactly how to interpret Korea's role in Armageddon from
> >> > reading the Bible,

> >> Make it up, everybody else does.

> >  Wasn't Jesus Korean?

> > Perhaps he was Mongol.

> >> And Korea? Cause anything? You gotta be kidding. We could flatten that
> >> entire rice pattie without breaking a sweat...

> > South Korea being blown off the map would bring chaos to the markets.

> > It doesn't mean WWIII, but may as well be...

> > China, a wild card

> <snip>

> No, I don't buy it.

> Let me preface by saying I am *not* leveling any accusations against you
> personally but, rather, at the nattering set of "news" people and
> politicos. Okay?

> Basically, the "mysterious China" is racism. It has echoes of the old
> Yellow Peril in it. We need to jettison the "inscrutable Asian" ***and
> get real.

> China is behaving *quite* rationally given the situation. That is, while
> their current government is a bunch of thugs and thieves, they're not
> idiots. They know damn well that they have to keep their economy on the
> "overheated" setting to mitigate against unrest and overthrow. Something
> they *cannot* do without the West. And, mind you, without stable,
> orderly, robust markets.

> I do not believe they'd slit their own throats for Ding Dong Ill. If he
> thinks he has their full backing, he's crazy. Hardly a surprise I
> suppose. <g>

> If Ding Dong actually launched a nuclear attack, China might make pro-N.
> Korea noises while they sat and watched N. Korea be bombed out of
> existence. They're just not stupid. A confrontation with the West means
> no more high speed economy which means the peasants drag them out of
> their palaces and slaughter them. No more lifestyle of the rich and
> dictatorial.

> China doesn't have us over a barrel. We have each other over a barrel.
> It's a new world.

> And, anyway, Ding Dong Ill does this kind of ***to get attention. Like
> a bratty kid, sending us into a tizzy is the *point*. It makes him appear
> larger than life. His worst fear is we'll realize he's all mouth and
> shrug when he has a tantrum.

> Besides, they were the first nation in history to have a nuclear test in
> which the entire freaking planet went, "Um... was that actually a nuke or
> did he just blow off his own fingers?"

> If Ding Dong Ill tries lobbing nukes at anybody, he may well blow himself
> up...

Yes, your explanation is very rational, and yet human history is full
of irrationality, perhaps 90% of it. ;)

It would have been irrational that Hitler took on both America and
Russia, and yet his ego was bigger than his intellect --and so that of
the German people. I don't see China trying to conquer the world --
yet-- but if you nuke N Korea, millions of Chinese may be affected by
it, and that's hard to hide under a rug.

Human brain is no better than mice' brain. Three escaped and one acted
in a rational way coming back to the cage for food and water. The rest
went underground and damaged my property, one I found dead, and the
other I caught with a glue trap.

I love my smart mouse now. ;)