by
>>> In message
>>>>>>> The Newton was much more full featured than the iPad causing it
>>>>>>> to run much
>>>>>>> slower. After Apple stripped out all the good features, the
>>>>>>> Appholes assumed
>>>>>>> ?if it appeared to run faster it must be better when in fact the
>>>>>>> Newton
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> far superior, relatively speaking.
>>>>>>> FYI: they are both junk..
>>>>>>> Please: explain in what ways you think "the Newton was much
>>>>>>> more full featured than the iPad". What features did it have
>>>>>>> that the iPad lacks? (This should be good for a laugh.)
>>>>>> My role in life does not include educating a clod like you. It
>>>>>> would be wasted effort on my part.
>>>>>> Try Google if you know how.
>>>>> Sorry, but it's your claim.
>>>>> And as usual: you have nothing.
>>>> The only feature that the Newton had that _might_ be considered as
>>>> something
>>>> missing form the iPad is handwriting recognition. There are
>>>> however 6 or more
>>>> App's to fill that "void" should you really miss it.
>>> This just proves you never really used a Newton.
>>> Newton had (heck, has) a lot that all the modern smart devices are
>>> still missing.
>> Yet I notice your list of all these features is missing. I'm sure
>> you'll be posting it shortly to clear up this oversight.
> Now I'm wondering what these features are...
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch