Clipping the wings is wrong

Description of your first forum.

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by TIMO AUTIOKARI, P: INT+358 0 511 5280, FAX: INT+358 0 511 64 » Fri, 24 Jun 1994 23:54:57



Hi,

I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I suppose
done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally escape.

So if you have a baby, would you "clip" his/her legs for the same reason ?

No, you are carefull, and look after the infant that no harm is done.

So, is it so, that people are so lazy, that they prefer to make the bird
cripple, than be carefull ?

I think that the wing clipping is a maltreatment, that should be prosecuted.

Timo

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Tim Per » Sat, 25 Jun 1994 03:43:17



Quote:
> Hi,
> I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I suppose
> done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally escape.
> So if you have a baby, would you "clip" his/her legs for the same reason ?
> No, you are carefull, and look after the infant that no harm is done.
> So, is it so, that people are so lazy, that they prefer to make the bird
> cripple, than be carefull ?
> I think that the wing clipping is a maltreatment, that should be prosecuted.
> Timo

My tiel has climbed up and down the side of his cage and cought a long *** feather
between the bars, and he nearly bled to death twice. He isnt graceful enough to fly
around indoors without hitting things and hurting himself or getting into someting
he shouldnt, or knocked unconscious.

Now he is clipped and perfectly content to hippity hop around. That little dude
can run like you wouldnt believe too. Now therewill be no more episodes of having
to pull a f**ked up feather and trim skin with scissors and bleed all over the place.

He has been clipped for about 2 months now and the problem for him and me are
in place now. I can do the trim myself and im very good at it and he doesnt even
mind it.

Cruel or concerned?

Yours truly,
NotLazy

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Cathy Quinon » Sat, 25 Jun 1994 04:14:50



Quote:
>Hi,

>I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I suppose
>done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally escape.

Wrong.  It is done to prevent the bird from flying into a mirror or glass
window and hurting itself (stunning itself, breaking its neck are possible
outcomes).  Any bird, no matter how tame, can get freaked out and accidentally
fly into a solid object, no matter how easily it may evade it under normal
circumstances.  Clipping is also useful for birds showing excessive
aggression.

It is also done to cut down the chance of having the bird escape.  The average
pet bird will not know how to survive in the wild, and most likely soon die
of exposure, disease, or predation. If I am reading the header right, you
are posting from Finland... what's the chance of an escaped parrot surviving
in the wild in your country?  Some birds may manage for a while in milder
climates, some may even become established and breed, but those are the
exceptions... not to mention their adapting to the wild may wreak havoc
upon native species.

Quote:

>So if you have a baby, would you "clip" his/her legs for the same reason ?

This is an extremely faulty analogy.  Feathers are like hair, read DEAD
tissue.  They can regrow (as opposed to the inability of humans to regenerate
lost limbs).  When feathers are cut the bird does not experience pain,
as opposed to amputation.  Finally, birds with clipped wings (depending
on the clip) can still glide and even fly a bit, not to mention walk.
Bird do use their feet in the wild for locomotion, in case you didn't know.
There are also flightless birds that survive just fine (through million of
years of evolutionary history) without the capacity to fly.

Quote:
>No, you are carefull, and look after the infant that no harm is done.

And still kids get run over by cars, fall off their bikes and trees,
and suffer damage, not to mention death.  I guess you advocate stashing
a fully flighted bird into a cage and keeping it safe and sound that
way, possibly after welding the cage shut?  After all, any time you let
this bird out you could possibly endanger its life.

Quote:
>So, is it so, that people are so lazy, that they prefer to make the bird
>cripple, than be carefull ?

No, it is that people have given careful thought to the situation and have
come to think that in many cases the only responsible thing to do is to clip
a bird's wings.  You obviously have no idea of how much love, time and money
lots of people dedicate to their pet birds.  You have no clue of how many
hours some birds spend ouside of their cages, in circumstances where a clipped
bird is safe and where a fully flighted bird would be a hazard to itself.

Quote:
>I think that the wing clipping is a maltreatment, that should be prosecuted.

>Timo

I think you need to get a clue, not to mention some manners.

I am hoping this post was the result of someone leaving their terminal
unattended.  Obviously there's always room to debate clipping vs. not
clipping, but this character's attitude strikes me as annoying as hell...

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Eric Hi » Sat, 25 Jun 1994 05:21:17



Quote:
>I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I suppose
>done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally escape.

So, Timo, have you ever seen a bird run into a closed window?  It's not very
nice; birds often die from flying into windows.  What about a handfed pet
that has spent it's entire life in the presence of humans.  If that bird
escapes and isn't found by a caring person, it *will* starve.  My bird, Max,
escaped a month or two ago, his wings hadn't been clipped recently.  I had
no clue that he was upset, until he flew off a friends shoulder into the night.
LA is a big place, Timo, I was so worried about Max.  I realized that I might
never see him again, but I didn't care about that so much, I just wanted him
to be safe.  Luckily, several days later he was found by about a half mile
away.  He acted like he hadn't eaten in a week, I think that he hadn't.  My
point is that ost of these clipped birds are pets, they don'y know anything
else, so they are clipped for their own protection.  I don't intend to ever
let Max 'escape' again, because I care about him.

Quote:
>No, you are carefull, and look after the infant that no harm is done.
>So, is it so, that people are so lazy, that they prefer to make the bird
>cripple, than be carefull ?

Do you not understand what it means to clip a bird's wings?  No permentent
disfigurement results.  Wing 'clipping' is simply the shortening of a birds
primary feathers, the first ten or so on the end of the wing.  No bones are
cut.  The birds skin is not broken. Only the feathers are cut, and Timo,
feathers grow back.  I admit that a wing clipping is more serious than a hair
cut, but by the same token I would not liken it to the baby gimping metaphor
which you so naively used.

Timo, the people on this group care about their birds, and they clip their
wings because they care.  I suggest that you find a better cause in life than
badgering consciencious pet owners.  Maybe 'brutatlity' in the cattle industry,
or I could tell you some good stories about what they do to spent thoroghbred
horses, just leave these nice people alone, they don't deserve your crap.

--Eric S. Hill

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by CSS S » Sat, 25 Jun 1994 14:18:03



(TIMO AUTIOKARI, P: INT+358 0 511 5280, FAX: INT+358 0 511 6496)
writes:

"I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I
suppose
done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally
escape."

No, this is done to protect the bird.  When a bird is flighted, there
are too many possibilities for accidents.  Birds tend to fly into
windows, mirrors, sometimes even walls.  They can fly faster than
their owners can walk, so comparing them to babies just doesn't work.
Babies crawl around on the ground, v-e-r-y slowly.  Birds fly through
the air and land where people can't reach them.

There are other issues, too.  I had a flighted budgie that destroyed
the tops of all my drapes.  I had another one who kept landing behind
furniture that was difficult to move.  By the time I got him out, he
was panting and terrified.

It's important to do what is best for the bird, and that includes
what is safest.  All of my birds have their wings clipped.  I have
ladders all over the house,  a four-foot manzinita tree, three
playpens - so they have a way to get around, and things to do.  And I
don't have to worry about them getting stuck behind the refrigerator!

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Michele Godda » Sun, 26 Jun 1994 05:00:38



Quote:
>I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I suppose
>done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally escape.

>So if you have a baby, would you "clip" his/her legs for the same reason ?

There is one major difference between a bird and a baby.  I can run
after and catch up to a baby.  I cannot fly.

Michele Lyons

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Steven P. Thomps » Sun, 26 Jun 1994 12:54:33



Quote:
>Hi,

>I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I suppose
>done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally escape.

>So if you have a baby, would you "clip" his/her legs for the same reason ?

>No, you are carefull, and look after the infant that no harm is done.

>So, is it so, that people are so lazy, that they prefer to make the bird
>cripple, than be carefull ?

>I think that the wing clipping is a maltreatment, that should be prosecuted.

>Timo

     It seems to me that this article was obviously posted to start a flame
of this, oh say, 1000 times, that might be cool.
     We all know the benefits of wing clipping and I would urge you to not
give this poster the satisfaction of getting a major reaction out of us. This
is such a pleasant group, let's keep it that way.
                                                    THANX :-)

                                                        ~Steve

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Dawn Bustano » Sun, 26 Jun 1994 17:09:49


To all of you who were offended by this posting, I think the poster in all
likelihood is not a bird owner, did not intend to tick people off, but is simplyignorant.  Many of my non-bird friends think the same thing until they
understand the reasons (we all know what they are).  Let's not let this turn
into a 10 posts a day thread. This is such a friendly group;  let's keep it
that way!

Dawn
Seattle, Wa

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Joe Sale » Sat, 25 Jun 1994 04:17:53



Quote:
>I'm rather upset about the clipping of the bird's wings. This is I suppose
>done solely for the reason that the bird does not accidentally escape.

>So, is it so, that people are so lazy, that they prefer to make the bird
>cripple, than be carefull ?

>I think that the wing clipping is a maltreatment, that should be prosecuted.

I'm sure you're going to get a lot of responses on this one, but there
is NOTHING about clipping a birds wings that is in any way
maltreatment or cruel.  If it were, then avian vets and bird trainers
wouldn't recommend it.

Birds don't have any feeling in the parts of the feathers that are
clipped, so they don't get hurt by the clipping.  And they can still
fly, just not long distances or gain much altitude, so it doesn't make
the bird "a cripple."  It also makes the bird more interested in its
human companions (and somewhat dependant on them), and easier to train
so it doesn't get into trouble in the future.

It has nothing to do with lazyness; have you ever seen how fast a bird
can fly?  Have you ever chased a bird around the house, or seen one hit a
mirror or window so hard it broke its neck?  Or landed someplace
dangerous (a hot stove, boiling water, the toilet bowl) and died?

A bird is not a human baby -- it's a pet that's dependant on us for its
well-being.  And part of that dependence means our taking
responsibility for keeping it out of trouble.  Clipping a dogs wings
is no more maltreatment than having a pet dog neutered.

----------

Compuserve: 72631,23   FidoNet: 1:109/136   MCI Mail: 433-3961

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Dana of Sally & Da » Sun, 26 Jun 1994 18:42:00


Hi folks:
Dodger (TAG) is making his own phrases in English now.  Of course he
is learning the words that strikes his fancy and not necessarily the
ones we want him to learn.  He says, "step up" because we use the
step up command and when we walk out of a room he says, "Be right
back", also when he sees us getting ready to go to work in the morning
we get a series of "Bye Byes".  Sally calls him little goose and one
day he started saying, "little goose," later that day he was saying
"little goose" over and over then said, "goose step."  using step from
step up.  I started to teach him animal sounds like you teach a kid.
You know, like what does a dog say?  Ruff.  What does a cow say? Moo
What does a cat say?  Meow.  I was doing the dog thing a couple of
weeks and then added, what does a pig say?  He loved, "Oink, Oink" and
said that after hearing it after a day or two.  He only made the dog
sound after a month and a half and then only rarely.  He likes "Meow"
and what Sally asked him, what does a parrot say he said, "Hello!"
In a couple of days Sally got him to make the chicken sound, "Buck,
buck, bugguck!"  So now we have a Timneh walking around doing "Oink,
oink, buck buck bugguck!"  Over the memorial day weekend we drove out
to Phoenix, AZ to visit my mother on the way back I let my heavy foot
get the better of me and we got stopped by the Highway Patrol just
outside of Indio.  The trooper was pretty nice about it even though
I got the ticket, but he kept looking at the cages in the back seat
where Dodger and Ridley (Budgie) were saftey belted.  I was very
happy the Dodger didn't say, "Oink, oink, goose step, goose step!"
Regards,
Dana
 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Philip F. Wigh » Sun, 26 Jun 1994 15:45:52


Timo - either you are just pulling our leg in order to start a flame, or
you have never had anything to do with birds as a pet.  One simple
example from my "past" should be sdufficient.  About 27 years ago I
brought home my first macaw.  When we entered the house I thought
it would be fun to see the bird in flight, so I released him in the
living room.  If you have never stood below a macaw trying to fly
ina small room you have no idea the power they generate.  I have
felt similar breeezes generated by helicopters.  Well, the bird
bounced off a couple of wells then flew to the highest point in the
room and attempted to land on top of a globe on the top of my
bookshelf.  The globe, of course, rotated and dumped the poor bird
on the floor.  There I recovered him.  He had broken one wing and
had busted a pin feather in the other wing, and there I was, a
neophyte, trying to stop the *** flow from bboth wounds.  It was
a stupid blunder and I have made sure, for the health and safety of
my birds, to keep them trimmed, because I don't believe in cages
for large birds - I believe in the freedom of a perch.  If you keep
a large, intelligent bird in a cage for years, his entire world is
bounded by those bars and after awhile he loses interest in
anything outside the cage.  On the other hand, a bird on a perch
knows the entire room, or house, as his world and he takes more of
an interest in everyone and everything around him.

OK, I'll get down from the soapbox.  I respectfully submit that you
know nothing about which you speak.

Cheers,
Phil

---------------------------------
--

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by TIMO AUTIOKARI, P: INT+358 0 511 5280, FAX: INT+358 0 511 64 » Mon, 27 Jun 1994 19:38:30


Quote:

> To all of you who were offended by this posting, I think the poster in all
> likelihood is not a bird owner, did not intend to tick people off, but is simplyignorant.  Many of my non-bird friends think the same thing until they
> understand the reasons (we all know what they are).  Let's not let this turn
> into a 10 posts a day thread. This is such a friendly group;  let's keep it
> that way!  Dawn

Yes, I have a couple of budgerigar's and a couple of cocatiel's. They are
quite happy birds, and all the four of them flies freely inhouse.

I would not ever consider to take their basic method of locomotion away, by
clipping their wings. I see it as a very cruel thing to do.

The most naive pro wing clipping argument I have seen is that the wing
clipping is like a haircut and the feathers grow back. But then the wings
are again cut. Denying the most important and enjoyable capability (for a
bird), the ability to fly, for the life.

Timo

 
 
 

Clipping the wings is wrong

Post by Cathy Quinon » Tue, 28 Jun 1994 13:09:43



Quote:

>> To all of you who were offended by this posting, I think the poster in all
>> likelihood is not a bird owner, did not intend to tick people off, but is simplyignorant.  Many of my non-bird friends think the same thing until they
>> understand the reasons (we all know what they are).  Let's not let this turn
>> into a 10 posts a day thread. This is such a friendly group;  let's keep it
>> that way!  Dawn

>Yes, I have a couple of budgerigar's and a couple of cocatiel's. They are
>quite happy birds, and all the four of them flies freely inhouse.

This is your choice, but assuming your house has windows or doors, one could
fly off and you would have to deal with the consequences.

Besides, frankly, how can you state that your birds are happy?  By the same
authority, those of us who have clipped birds can say the same thing about
our clipped pets.  I think it takes more than flying to make a happy bird,
and conversely, flightlessnes doesn't negate happiness.  

Quote:
>I would not ever consider to take their basic method of locomotion away, by
>clipping their wings. I see it as a very cruel thing to do.

Like I said before, I personally would feel guilty if one of my birds
flew off to a likely death by starvation or predation, or broke its neck
by flying into a window or mirror or wall.  

Besides, let's define "basic": it means something that is strictly necessary.
A bird that can still walk to its roost/cage/food dish/water dish/toys
is still fulfilling its basic needs, exercise included (if it engages in
flapping which most birds do).

Quote:
>The most naive pro wing clipping argument I have seen is that the wing
>clipping is like a haircut and the feathers grow back. But then the wings
>are again cut. Denying the most important and enjoyable capability (for a
>bird), the ability to fly, for the life.

>Timo

Well, Timo, I guess you have a direct line to your birds' brains (not to
mention those of other peoples') and can ascertain happines is solely
determined by ability to fly.

As to "the ability to fly, for their life," this doesn't apply to those of
us who keep our houses free of potential bird predators!!!!  That, in my
opinion, *is* the most naive anti-wing clipping argument.  I've seen
the neighbor's cat take songbirds right off our lawn, and we are talking
about birds who were wild, used to living in the wild, with senses
supposedly honed to predator evasion.  My 'tiel wouldn't stand a chance,
he sees a cat and he wants to go sing to it...

This argument grows tiresome.  If you think you can keep your birds safe
and flighted, do so, but don't assume that by doing not clipping you are
protecting them from predators or household threats 100%.  If you would
rather not learn from the experiences of others, that's your prerogative.
Just don't go making accusations about "cruelty" when you have no proof
whatsoever that clipped birds are psychologically damaged or in pain or
unhappy.  Next time you read a kiwi's mind, or mind-link with an ostrich,
and they convey the message that they do feel like lesser citizens of the
class Aves because they are physically incapable of flight we can talk about
this so-called cruelty.